Acti's Banner
Acti

Age/Gender: 18, Male
Location: Aveiro, Portugal
Job: Pc, skate

Hi. Well i am just a guy who like see flash's and play pc. Here my Mail. lOloLOl I am Portuguese. MSN: rafaelfernandes50@ho tmail.com MAIL: rafaelfernandes50@ho tmail.com XFIRE: cry2k

Contact Info

Newgrounds Stats

Sign-Up Date:
7/18/07

Level: 18
Aura: Fab

Rank: Police Sergeant
Blams: 138
Saves: 936
Rank #: 6,955

Whistle Status: Garbage

Exp. Points: 3,210 / 3,600
Exp. Rank #: 8,058
Voting Pow.: 5.95 votes

BBS Posts: 265 (0.3 per day)
Flash Reviews: 124
Music Reviews: 8
Trophies: 0
Stickers: 0

Entry #8

Newer Older

Jump to Entry: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 ]


Acti

Oblivion Syndrome

Posted by Acti Nov. 21, 2007 @ 2:31 PM EST

I've noticed, lately, that many games seem to be suffering from the dreaded 'Oblivion Syndrome'.

No, I don't mean that the games give you a meaningless Horse Armour download. No, I don't mean that they have Sean Bean in a starring role (although that, at least, wouldn't be such a bad thing). I don't even mean that they aim slightly higher than they achieve.

No, I'm talking about the bane of console Oblivioners lives: Dynamic encounter scaling.

For the uninitiated, let me explain in non-medical terms. In Oblivion, the creatures in the world adapt to your level. So, when you're a neophyte adventurer taking your first steps, you might find a necromancer's apprentice lurking near some ancient ruins. If you were to visit those same ruins later in the game, the apprentice might be a fully-fledged Necromancer now, offering you more of a challenge. Go to the ruins when you're a mighty, renowned hero, and you'll find twelve Necromancers and an undead horde.

And yes, this kind of scaling does indeed ensure that the game gives you an even challenge as you progress throughout it. No area is off-limits because its inhabitants are too difficult to defeat, and you're always going to have a good fight ahead.

Where it doesn't make sense though, is that you end up with basic bandits with full daedric armour and oversized magical axes bearing down on you every time you leave a village, and entire cavern networks full of minotaur lords. And yes, they're a more even challenge. But they're also rather unfeasible from a logical point of view (as if logic applies to games, I hear you cry), and, moreover, they devoid you of any sense of advancement as a character.

Call me old fashioned, or just a little sadistic, but I actually like the feeling in traditional RPGs where there are areas that you just can't really go yet because the inhabitants are too powerful for you- yet. I like going back to early areas of the game and seeing just how strong my characters have become now since I first went there. Sure, it can mean that open-ended games are a little hit-and-miss with how they present their enemies, as you could wonder into a dungeon full of liche lords that tear you to shreds. But equally, you might enter a cavern full of pathetic goblins which you can slaughter while laughing heartily. And that, for me, is some of the thrill- you never really know what you're going to face through the next door. Morrowind balanced this expertly, and you knew when you really shouldn't be going to another area by the way a frenzied Guar would suddenly tear you to shreds.

But love it or hate it, Oblivion Syndrome is here to stay, it seems. And moreover, its spreading. Already the Syndrome has become widespread amongst certain RPGs. And it's starting to cross genre boundaries too. Could we have a nigh-impossible Syndrome epidemic on our hands? We sent Asian reporter Trisha Takanawa to find out.

"Thanks Splinter, but I have no idea what you're talking about."

Ok... Thanks for that, Trisha. Well, I guess that sums it up, doesn't it? She hasn't noticed it. In fact, a lot of you probably haven't noticed it. But nevertheless, its sneaking in to our gaming lives. Puzzle Quest is the first key example I can think of, but you'll also see examples of it throughout RPG titles like the Witcher and even Two Worlds, although with Two Worlds its less of an issue since most of the enemies are easy anyway. But it seems like the concept of dynamic scaling is here to stay. Perhaps it's a good thing. Perhaps it's easier for the developers to implement, rather than set out placement for creature types dependent on game world region. Perhaps.

And yet... I'm still not convinced that I like the idea of a humble bandit stalking the outskirts of a rural village, sheltering in some abandoned ruins, leaping out at you with his shiny glass armour and glowing magical sword.

Maybe I'm taking the whole thing too seriously. I don't know. But I know for sure that I don't like the idea of this spreading across too many games. Like I said before, I'm all for more difficult creatures popping up as you go through the game. But I want my sense of advancement back, too. And, while you're at it, how about some more games with great, emotionally involving storylines, too?

But that's another issue, and another blog post, I fear.

Log in to comment! | Share this!

The People Have Spoken

10 Comments

Nov. 21, 2007 | 4:22 PM boodemon says:

i agreed with you! but its kind of a good thing...
for example :in oblivion when you are high level, i think its kinda usefull to have bandit who wear daedric armor cauz' you want a daedric armor.if you know what i mean...
and yes i agreed with you on the other point. it is fun to see how you've growed stronger by returning into you firt cave for example. by the way, in oblivion(i only got that game ^^) even if you are lvl 25, goblin sucks...

Nov. 22, 2007 | 1:38 PM Acti responds:

Thanks!


Nov. 21, 2007 | 4:23 PM boodemon says:

oh i forget: WOOOOT FIRST COMMENT!!!!

Nov. 22, 2007 | 1:38 PM Acti responds:

LolOLolOL!!!!!!!!! Congrats!


Jan. 11, 2008 | 3:52 PM jacobcoooollll10 says:

oblivions an awesome game they shuld have an online part were in the arena were u fight others.. im bit bored with oblivion now i did 138 quets and im pwanging everything but not much for me to do unlees i download shivering isles or something


Jan. 23, 2008 | 11:55 PM Frag-Reaper says:

Well, if you didn't play the retarded console version, you would have access to all sorts of mods, some of which can remove the encounter scaling. But I guess that doesn't actually solve your problem. PC ftw.


Jan. 23, 2008 | 11:57 PM Frag-Reaper says:

Or do you play PC?


Jan. 25, 2008 | 12:13 PM Kottbullar says:

I kinda agee with your opinion.
In some fields the new RPGs are just a little exaggerated...
I think it's enough to have the basics and maybe some special additions in a game and the classics actually thrill me as much as probably the new generation RPGs like Oblivion would. Of course features (like a horse) are nice but an RPG is about getting stronger, getting to know the fictional world and finishing lots of quests.
I really loved Gothic I and II (haven't played III yet; my PC would probably fail badly X[ ), but still, I could hardly imagine that unrealistic equipped enemies and a bunch of unnecessary special features would increase the fun of a game overall.
For me it's the story and the atmosphere of a game which are important and to have a good atmosphere there must also be many huge ares with gigant Orks and other monsters which jump out of the next bush and kill you without letting you any chance if you are not careful of did not get enough informations obout a territory. That's what makes a game thrilling!


Jan. 26, 2008 | 4:50 PM Swordstick76 says:

you make an interesting point, good sir. I think that perhaps what you said is true, but the best always lies in the middle in life so as i see, so i believe that the best way to make a game would be to have some dynamic scaling and some traditional whupping ass.


Jan. 26, 2008 | 11:49 PM darksim2 says:

Though I've never played (nore heard of) Oblivian Syndrome, I kind of agree with you. In most free roam games, I do like to travel back to old areas and stomp on the old enemies that gave me problems early on (Take that Midgar Zolom!). I suppose it is nice though if you are trying to level up. It would save a lot of time in that area. And I fully agree with your last bit about the emotionally involved storylines.


Jan. 27, 2008 | 5:36 PM slayer114 says:

Numa Numa ... HAY!


Jan. 29, 2008 | 4:03 PM davada says:

I agree. Thanks for explaining what oblivion syndrome really meant to. I was looking at it thinking... Umm... Is that something I mihgt have??? Anyways, yeah. I agree that it isn't a good thing. I have always been a fan of Final Fantasy type adventure games. And I think that is a good example of traditional rpgs. I love going back to plaves knowing I have absolutely nothing to worry about. One spell and all my enemies are overkilled. And I like going to fight the final boss, but find out that there are just regular monsters that will kill me before I get the chance, so I gotta level up some more to just see the last boss, and then find out I gotta level up some more cause he crushed me in one blow... But before I get off topic, Lemme just conclude by saying that you make an excellent, well written point. That is all for now.

Newer Older

Jump to Entry: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 ]